Listen to Michael Jordan attempt to utter the phrase "Gatorade. Is it in you?" and fail miserably. You're welcome.
Tumblr has quickly become my favorite social network. It features many of the best aspects of other sites while maintaining a unique identify of its own. Its popularity and reach rival Facebook, its photography is on par with Instagram and Flickr, and its iOS and Android apps are arguably the most intuitive and well designed of any major social network. Below you’ll find a list of my favorite Tumblogs.
Beautiful visualizations and charts that run the gamut from informative to hilarious.
Vice Magazine’s blog features beautiful photography highlighting interesting stories that you won’t find anywhere else.
Central Park’s official blog. Expect beautiful photos and videos of Central Park along with tips on where to go and what to do.
Run by a German Japanophile, Kuroyuki features photos highlighting everyday life in Japan.
Videogame, anime, and minimalist photography.
Vivienne Gucwa is an amazing photography who has a knack for making New York City look amazing. A must follow for fans of the city.
David Guttenfelder is one of the most well traveled and talented photographers in the world. His blog features photos taken during his travels in Afghanistan, North Korea, Japan, Iraq, and Africa.
Instagram’s official blog.
Some of the best minimalist photography to be found online (occasionally NSFW).
Another collection of minimalist photography (occasionally NSFW).
Earlier this month I visited Russia (Moscow and St. Petersburg) for the first time. I took over 1,000 photos along the way with my Canon 60D with several lenses. Feel free to visit my Flickr Album for more photos including high-res downloadable versions.
The last fireworks display in Coney Island signifies the unofficial end of summer. Au revoir summer
Once again summer is coming to an end. Nothing represents summer better than an amusement park.
Remember the AOL customer service call that went viral in 2006? What's old is new again. Listening to Ryan Block call Comcast in order to cancel his service is difficult to say the least. Try to get through the entire call without becoming infuriated if you can.
In an interesting turn of events Google+ has decided to end its real-name policy. Google+ users will now be able to use the service using a pseudonym. While there are many legitimate reasons to maintain anonymity online, this latest move by Google+ has a certain air of desperation to it. In its post explaining the decision the search company claims that it's real name policy "...has been unclear" leading to "...unnecessarily difficult experiences for some of our users."
While Google's policy reversal should make it easier for users to register for the service, one has to wonder whether this will actually help increase user adoption and engagement on the site. I personally feel that the real-name policy helped keep conversations on the social network far more civil and thoughtful than they probably would have been. As we all know a bit too well, anonymity online is a double-edged sword.
In this post I would like to focus one particular aspect of the revamp: mayorships. Analyzing mayorhips, and more importantly, why they are being downplayed significantly is in my opinion a model for how and why Foursquare is changing as a company.
Dennis Crowley has been saying for a while that Foursquare, while popular, has a perception problem. Most people view Foursquare as a game. It’s the app where users check-in to try to win badges and mayorships when the fact of the matter is, Foursquare offers far more than that. Over the years it has matured into a product that thanks to billions of check-ins, features a fairly comprehensive and easy to use recommendation engine. Downplaying the gamification aspect of the app while highlighting discovery is their way of forcing their community of over 45 million to alter their behavior.
Discounts seem to be going away as well. I’ll admit that as a user, this is probably the one feature that I will miss. From a business and product perspective, I can understand why they are making this change. By eliminating discounts they are eliminating the need to strike deals with brick and mortar businesses. Anyone who has visited a bar or restarurant’s outdated, tacky flash based website will attest to the fact that many small businesses are not exactly leaping into the 21st century head first.
Keep in mind that while Fousquare is a social network, at the end of the day, they're competing with the likes of Yelp and Zagat, not Facebook and Twitter.
Earlier today the New York Times published a piece written by Marc Andreessen (a co-founder of the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz) titled "Why Bitcoin Matters". This article is, in my opinion, the most compelling case that has been made for Bitcoin thus far. While many have defended the virtual currency, here is what makes Andreesen's case so compelling:
He has a knack for accurately predicting tech trends:
He's predicted the rise of social, the cloud and the web browser itself to name a few. Andreesen introduces his readers to Bitcoin my making the following claim:
"Eventually mainstream products, companies and industries emerge to commercialize it; its effects become profound; and later, many people wonder why its powerful promise wasn’t more obvious from the start. What technology am I talking about? Personal computers in 1975, the Internet in 1993, and – I believe – Bitcoin in 2014."
Because he isn't the type to make grandiose statements often, when he does he should be taken seriously.
He puts his money where his mouth is:
Andreesen Horowitz has invested over $50 million in Bitcoin related companies so far (including $25 million in Coinbase alone).
He sees Bitcoin as more than just a digital currency:
When most people defend or denounce Bitcoin they focus solely on its application as a digital currency. Andreesen goes beyond that and focuses on its potential as a secure method of transfer for digital and physical goods.
"...Bitcoin gives us, for the first time, a way for one Internet user to transfer a unique piece of digital property to another Internet user, such that the transfer is guaranteed to be safe and secure, everyone knows that the transfer has taken place, and nobody can challenge the legitimacy of the transfer. The consequences of this breakthrough are hard to overstate.
What kinds of digital property might be transferred in this way? Think about digital signatures, digital contracts, digital keys (to physical locks, or to online lockers), digital ownership of physical assets such as cars and houses, digital stocks and bonds … and digital money."